|
Captive
[Пленный]
Russia and Bulgaria, 2008
Color, 80 minutes
Russian and Chechen with English subtitles
Director: Aleksei Uchitel'
Screenplay: Vladimir Makanin with Timofei
Dekin
Cinematography: Iurii Klimenko
Music: Leonid Desiatnikov
Cast: Viacheslav Krikunov, Petr Logachev,
Iraklii Mskhalaia, Iuliia Peresil'd, Sergei Umanov, Andrei
Fes'kov, Tagir Rakhimov, Dagun Omaev, Raisa Gichaeva, Larisa
Shamsadova, Svetlana Dorokhina
Producer: Aleksei Uchitel'
Production: Rock Films (Russia) with Camera
Studio (Bulgaria)
Aleksei Uchitel'’s latest film, Captive,
returns explicitly to the theme of the war in Chechnia, a
theme that until recently had been absent from Russian feature
films since Aleksei Balabanov’s War (2003). Captive
joins Nikita Mikhalkov’s 12 and Aleksandr Sokurov’s
Aleksandra, both released in 2007, to constitute a small
wave of films that return to this theme even as Russia’s political
leadership is attempting to bring the military conflict in
that region to an official, if not necessarily happy, end.
Like these two preceding films, Captive also returns
to the war in Chechnia not so much to analyze this conflict
in particular, but to use it as a backdrop for the main action
of the film, which in each case could plausibly take place
in various times and in various places.
The film’s simple plot follows the journey
of two Russian soldiers, Rubakhin and Vovka, to rejoin their
company, which has been trapped and isolated by the enemy.
They are guided in their journey by a young Chechen fighter,
whom they have taken captive for this purpose. The film revolves
around the relationship that develops among the two Russians
and their attractive young prisoner. Their journey comes to
a frightening end, at which Rubakhin, the older of the two
soldiers, who has developed an affection for his young captive,
is forced into making a terrible decision. The cinematography,
which captures equally well the cruelty of war and the harsh
beauty of the natural mountainous environment, contributes
to the power of the film and makes up for the rather sparse
and not always continuous plot.
This film recalls in particular the first well-known
Russian film about the conflict in the Caucasus. Sergei Bodrov’s
film Prisoner of the Mountains (1996) also featured
two Russian soldiers and the relationship between them, as
well as their encounter with the indigenous mountain population.
Both Bodrov and Uchitel' chose to base their films on literary
texts: while Uchitel' took a contemporary writer’s short story,
Bodrov’s film was inspired by an older literary tradition.
Running through Tolstoi back to Lermontov and Pushkin, the
19th-century literary tradition of the “Caucasus captive”
involved the story of an erotic encounter between a Russian
military man from the nobility and an exotic girl from the
Caucasus. In this way, the fraught and complex relationship
between two peoples was figured simultaneously as that of
ruler and ruled, lover and beloved, male and female, burdened
and innocent, the civilized and the savage. All of these elements
were represented in Bodrov’s tendentious indictment of Russian
imperialism.
Uchitel'’s film differs from Bodrov’s film
in that the story’s center of gravity is located much more
clearly with the two Russian soldiers. In Captive, they are
portrayed as individuals rather than as genre-determined action
heroes or as demonstration pieces for a particular ideological
standpoint. Rubakhin and Vovka serve neither to glorify war
nor to represent an authorial plea for ethnic tolerance and
international understanding. They are simply Russian soldiers
thrust into a situation in which their individual moral convictions
are put to the test. Their behavior is natural and believable.
The plot of the film follows that of Makanin’s
literary text reasonably well. Uchitel', however, removes
two significant elements from Makanin’s original. The title,
“Captive of the Caucasus,” becomes denatured in the film,
rendered simply as Captive. Furthermore, the relationship
between Rubakhin and his young prisoner, depicted by Makanin
in explicitly homoerotic terms, is devoid of the erotic element
in the film. What is left is Rubakhin’s clear but mysterious
attachment to the Chechen boy, unexplained and inexplicable,
leading those viewers who know the literary source to postulate
an erotic attraction where Uchitel' specifically did not want
one.
The film clearly concentrates more on inner,
personal struggles rather than on the political and ideological
elements of the military conflict. Many critics would view
this emphasis as adding to the artistic quality of the work.
It is, however, tempting to view Uchitel'’s excision of the
national and erotic elements of Makanin’s story as a desire
to depoliticize the film. He erases those very elements that
might recall the way in which the Caucasus drama has been
embedded in the very fabric of Russian history for over two
centuries. Apparently, we are now expected to believe that
the war in Chechnia has become a mere historical episode,
the background against which conflicts of personal moral values
can be played out. At this historical moment, it may be the
only way in which this topic can be broached at all.
Captive was awarded the prize for
Best Director at the 2008 Karlovy Vary International Film
Festival.
Aleksei Uchitel'
Aleksei Uchitel' was born in Leningrad in 1951.
In 1975 he graduated from the department of cinematography
of the State Institute of Filmmaking (VGIK). He first made
his mark as a documentary filmmaker before turning to feature
films in the 1990s. In 1992 he became the artistic director
of Rock Films, where he continues to direct and produce feature
films. He is the recipient of numerous prizes for his films,
and in 2001 was honored with the title “People’s Artist of
Russia.”
Selected Filmography:
Note: A complete filmography would include some 20 documentary
films dating back to the early 1970s.
2008 Captive
2005 Dreaming of Space
2003 The Stroll
2000 His Wife’s Diary
1995 Giselle’s Mania
1993 Butterfly (documentary)
1990 Lateral Canal (documentary)
1987 Rock (documentary)
|